The key terms in this definition are "conscious effort" and a "common goal." Many instances of what could have been a successful nationalistic country did not have one or both of these things. China, for example, had a lot of national pride and consciously tried to unify people, but they did not have a common goal. The common goal of Europe was to spread their culture and what they considered to be the best ideas. Europe was a successful nationalistic country because they tried to unify their people under one goal. Their goal of colonialism helped them succeed in creating a positive change.
The Ottomans are another example of what could have been a successful country, but wasn't because there was no conscious effort to unify it's people. In a successful country, there is one main group in power and all the people are followers of that one leader. In the Ottoman empire however, there were many different groups all trying to lead at the same time, such as the Young Ottomans, Abd a-Hamid, and the Young Turks. This did not make for a very unified empire because nobody knew exactly who to follow.
I am not sure I agree with your definition. I agree that a "conscious effort" is necessary to change, but is it necessary to nationalism? The examples that you chose all took place during pivotal points in history where nationalism was admittedly involved, but that doesn't mean that nationalism is always like that. I feel almost that if a "conscious effort" must be made, then perhaps the nationalism produced isn't truly genuine. Shouldn't an emotion such as pride in one's country come from the heart and involuntary thought, rather than the will of a person.
ReplyDeleteI agree with what you said, but I think nationalism is more than just feeling patriotic. I think to have nationalism, the people of the country should really be doing something to help their country. For example in the U.S. today, there are soldiers fighting for our country and really making an effort, and that is what gives our country nationalism. Even if it's just wearing the colors red white and blue on September 11th or 4th of July, its making an outward effort to support your country.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Natalie. I see your point Nicole about how the effort should not be forced, however I think that just because an action is being carried on to publicize nationalism, does not mean that it is forced. It is indeed necessary to show your pride for your country in order for other people to understand it. Also, nationalism is somewhat contagious, as one may see the pride that other people have for their country, and based on that they could realize how much they actually love the country.
ReplyDelete